DodecaGreen The Green Chemistry Portal

Biogenic Carbon Content calculator.

Calculate the fraction and mass of carbon in a chemical process derived from biological (renewable) sources versus fossil sources. Enter feedstocks and products with their carbon composition — results update live and every session stays in your browser, never on a server.

Principle 7 guide
01

What is Biogenic Carbon Content — and why does it matter?

+

The Biogenic Carbon Content (BCC) quantifies what fraction of the carbon in a chemical process — in its feedstocks, products, or both — originated from biological (renewable) sources rather than fossil (non-renewable) sources. Biogenic carbon is derived from recently living biomass: plant-based feedstocks, agricultural residues, fermentation substrates, algae, or wood-derived chemicals. Fossil carbon comes from petroleum, natural gas, or coal.

GoalMaximise the fraction of carbon from biological sources — an ideal BCC of 100% means the process uses only renewable carbon, fully aligning with Green Chemistry Principle 7.
WhyBiogenic carbon is part of the short-term carbon cycle: when burned or biodegraded it returns CO₂ that was recently fixed from the atmosphere, unlike fossil carbon which adds net new CO₂. Higher BCC also reduces dependence on finite petroleum feedstocks.
HowReplace petroleum-derived solvents and reagents with bio-based equivalents, use fermentation-derived intermediates, design synthetic routes that start from renewable platform chemicals (e.g. HMF, lactic acid, succinic acid).

The formulas

$$\text{BCC}_{\text{fraction}} = \frac{m_{\text{C,bio}}}{m_{\text{C,bio}} + m_{\text{C,fossil}}}$$
SymbolTermUnits
\(\text{BCC}_{\text{fraction}}\)Biogenic Carbon Content as a fraction (0–1); multiply by 100 for %dimensionless; ideal value = 1
\(m_{\text{C,bio}}\)Total mass of carbon from biological (renewable) sourcesg (or kg)
\(m_{\text{C,fossil}}\)Total mass of carbon from fossil (non-renewable) sourcesg (or kg)

The carbon mass for each material is calculated as: $m_{\text{C}} = m_{\text{material}} \times \frac{w_{\text{C}}}{100}$, where $w_{\text{C}}$ is the carbon content in % w/w. The biogenic fraction of that carbon is then: $m_{\text{C,bio}} = m_{\text{C}} \times \frac{f_{\text{bio}}}{100}$, where $f_{\text{bio}}$ is the percentage of carbon atoms in the material that derive from a biological source (0–100%).

Two perspectives: feedstock BCC vs product BCC

PerspectiveWhat it measuresWhen to use
Feedstock BCCFraction of total carbon in all input materials that is biogenicAssessing supply-chain sustainability; feedstock selection decisions
Product BCCFraction of total carbon in the isolated product(s) that is biogenicCertifying bio-based content of a product; life-cycle assessment boundary; regulatory compliance (e.g. ASTM D6866, EN 16640)

This calculator reports both perspectives. If you only enter inputs, you get feedstock BCC. If you only enter products, you get product BCC. Entering both gives a complete picture.

How to determine % biogenic carbon

  • Pure bio-based material (e.g. glucose from corn starch, bio-ethanol, lactic acid from fermentation): 100% biogenic carbon.
  • Pure fossil-based material (e.g. petroleum-derived ethylene, toluene from refinery, acetone from propylene): 0% biogenic carbon.
  • Mixed or uncertain: Use the supplier's bio-based content certificate (ASTM D6866 radiocarbon test) or a mass-balance allocation. Enter the certified value directly.
  • Inorganic materials with no carbon (e.g. water, NaCl, metal catalysts): Enter 0% carbon content — they contribute nothing to BCC.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths

  • Directly quantifies progress toward Principle 7 (Renewable Feedstocks)
  • Simple to calculate; requires only mass and carbon composition data
  • Applicable at both product and process levels
  • Aligns with established standards (ASTM D6866, EN 16640, ISO 16620)
  • Useful for LCA system boundary definition and eco-labelling claims

Limitations

  • Does not capture land-use change, water use, or biodiversity impacts of bio-based feedstocks
  • Biogenic ≠ sustainable: unsustainable biomass use can have worse impacts than fossil feedstocks
  • Does not account for carbon sequestration or release during the process
  • Mixed-origin materials require careful mass-balance allocation or radiocarbon testing
  • High BCC does not imply low toxicity or low waste — use alongside E-factor and PMI

BCC in context: complementary green metrics

MetricWhat it measuresPrinciple
BCC (this tool)Fraction of carbon from renewable biological sources7 — Renewable Feedstocks
RFP (Renewable Feedstock Proportion)Fraction of total input mass from renewable sources7 — Renewable Feedstocks
E-factorMass of waste per mass of product1 — Prevent Waste
GWP (Carbon Footprint)Greenhouse gas emissions in CO₂-equivalents6 — Energy Efficiency
ZWI (Zero-Waste Index)Degree to which a process approaches zero waste1 — Prevent Waste
02

Experiment details

03

Input materials

Enter all input materials used in the process: reagents, solvents, catalysts, and auxiliaries. For each, provide the carbon content (% w/w) and the percentage of that carbon derived from biological sources. Materials with no carbon (e.g. water, salts) should have 0% carbon content.

Material name Role Mass used (g) Carbon (% w/w) Biogenic C (%) Biogenic C (g)
Feedstock BCC biogenic C / total C (inputs)
04

Desired product(s)

Enter the mass of each desired product actually isolated, its carbon content, and the fraction of that carbon that is biogenic. If the product is purely bio-based, enter 100% biogenic. For a product of unknown biogenic content, enter the value from a radiocarbon test (ASTM D6866) or a mass-balance calculation.

Product name Mass isolated (g) Carbon (% w/w) Biogenic C (%) Biogenic C (g)
Product BCC biogenic C / total C (products)
05

Results

Product BCC
% biogenic carbon (product)
Feedstock BCC
% biogenic carbon (inputs)
Biogenic C (inputs)
grams
Fossil C (inputs)
grams
Product BCC (higher is better)
0% (fossil)25%50%75%100% (fully bio)

Feedstock carbon: biogenic vs fossil by material

Biogenic vs fossil carbon balance

06

Detailed breakdown & interpretation

MaterialRoleMass (g) Carbon (g)Biogenic C (g)Fossil C (g)% of total CVisual
Enter input materials and/or products above to see breakdown.

Interpretation

Enter your input materials and/or product above to generate an interpretation.
07

Save & load sessions

Sessions are stored in your browser only. No data leaves your device.

No saved sessions yet.
08

Export

Export your BCC calculation as a PDF report or CSV data file. PDF opens in a new tab and uses your browser's print function. CSV downloads directly.

09

Where can I read more?

+

References are sorted alphabetically by first author.

  1. P. T. Anastas and J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN 978-0-19-850698-0. — Original statement of the 12 Principles; Principle 7 addresses use of renewable feedstocks.
  2. ASTM International. Standard Test Methods for Determining the Biobased Content of Solid, Liquid, and Gaseous Samples Using Radiocarbon Analysis. ASTM D6866. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. astm.org. — The primary radiocarbon method for certifying biogenic carbon content in materials and products.
  3. European Committee for Standardisation (CEN). Bio-based products — Determination of the bio-based carbon content. EN 16640:2017. — European standard for measuring bio-based carbon; commonly cited in bio-based product certification.
  4. J. H. Clark and F. E. I. Deswarte (eds.), Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass, 2nd edn, Wiley, 2015. ISBN 978-1-118-71448-5. — Comprehensive introduction to bio-based chemistry and platform chemicals.
  5. J. E. Holladay et al., Top Value-Added Chemicals from Biomass, Vol. II — Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Biorefinery Lignin, PNNL-16983, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2007. — Identifies key bio-based platform chemicals and their fossil-carbon baselines.
  6. ISO. Plastics — Bio-based content. ISO 16620 series (Parts 1–5). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. — International standard series for measuring and expressing bio-based content in plastics.
  7. J. Moncada et al., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 10591–10603. DOI. — Systematic framework for bio-based carbon accounting in biorefineries.
  8. R. A. Sheldon, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 32–48. DOI. — Metrics for the greenness of chemicals from biomass and renewable feedstocks.
10

Contributors

Roles follow the CRediT taxonomy (Contributor Roles Taxonomy), adapted for educational software. Hover a contributor's name for a summary, or a column header for the definition of that role.

Contributor

© 2024– DodecaGreen Project. All rights reserved. · Last updated: 09/06/2026

This portal was built with the assistance of a large language model (Claude, Anthropic), which was used to generate and refine code, articulate and structure contributed ideas within the defined page format, and support iterative design decisions. All scientific content, conceptual frameworks, pedagogical choices, and final outputs were directed, reviewed, and verified by the contributors listed above.

11

How do I cite this page?

+

If you use this tool in teaching or published work, please cite the DodecaGreen portal as the source.

Reference
BibTeX